- microsoft windows server 2003 operating systems
5 days 1 hour ago - adobe readstep html
5 days 2 hours ago - vimax
1 week 6 hours ago - Hello
1 week 1 day ago - Why is China so down on human rights?
15 weeks 1 day ago - Face Book No
15 weeks 1 day ago - Palante! Siempre Palante dvd
19 weeks 5 days ago - Dear Rosa !!!!
It is not
22 weeks 2 days ago - Applause to Arthur Henson- MUY MUY BIEN ! ADELANTE !!
22 weeks 2 days ago - palante
34 weeks 5 days ago
Some thoughts on the M-L corner of the blogosphere
This post is a bit self-referrential I suppose, but it seems like a good time to check in on the state of the Marxist-Leninist / Marxist-Leninist-Maoist corner of the blogosphere. Over the past year or so a definite milieu of US-based ML/MLM blogs has emerged that refer to and interact with each other. This milieu didn't exist in the same way a couple years ago. It seems we're at a juncture right now, with some of the best blogs from the past year in neglect or folding up shop, and with the birth of a few new, promising ML blogs. So lets talk about where we're at and how we got here.
It seems that first, back in the ancient history of the blogosphere like 2003-2004, there was a scattered assortment of individual ML blogs, operating mostly in isolation from each other and not usually lasting long. I only knew of a few at that time; there was Left Link blog, DW Vents Spleen, Dave Dudley's Dialectical Diary, People's War blog, the Stationmaster (blog by Magnus, the creator/moderator of Leftist Trainspotters playful sectariana email list, and a few others I can't remember anymore. Many came and went after a few posts in these early days of the ML blogosphere, and almost none generated discussion.
One breakthrough came around 2005 when a rash of RCP-supporter blogs appeared (the appearance of a bunch around the same time gave the sense of a party deicision to jump into the blogosphere). The best of those was Sunsara's World, the blog of RCP spokesperson Sunsara Taylor. But around the same time Comrade Carl's blog appeared (Carl Dix), as well as blogs by a few other RCP/RCYB supporters like Osage Bell, LA Writers Collective, Lives We Might Live, Sweep of History, Steel this Blog, and Reason in Revolt Now Thunders!.
While they jumped into the blogosphere with a big splash, only a couple of those blogs have continued to regularly update with original content. And the RCP-milieu bloggers almost are almost entirely self-referrential; as far as I can see they don't link to, engage with or post comments on other blogs outside their milieu. For a while Sunsara's World was the place to be, with regular updates and some lively discussion. Then the discussion started attracting some rather onerous trolls, and soon after Sunsara stopped regularly updating the blog. Lately she has only posted the occasional reprint of her articles that appear in Revolution newspaper. The two best RCP-milieu blogs that have so far stood the test of time are Lives We Might Live and Reason in Revolt Now Thunders!. Lives We Might Live, which is run by Araby Coltier, has a very literary focus, with interesting thoughts from a communist perspective on things going on in the literary and cultural world. It isn't updated very regularly anymore, but when it is the content is worth reading. I've read a couple books that I first heard about on Lives We Might Live blog, and that is quite a compliment I'd have to say, if a blog can convince you to read a book you wouldn't have otherwise read. Reason in Revolt Now Thunders, by Carl Miller, is updated regularly with Carl's thoughts on theoretical issues as well as recounting of experiences and stories with the left. It is very earnest and I enjoy reading it, even though I don't always agree with the political line.
As the flurry of RCP-inspired blogs hit the web, there were a few others that popped up from the circles of the two Freedom Road Socialist Organizations (FRSO (Marxist-Leninist) and FRSO (Left Refoundationist)). Stan Goff started a blog which attracted quite a bit of discussion, much of it interesting and on a fairly high theoretical level. There also appeared the Pottawatomie Creek blog, which is also sympathetic to the Left Refoundationist FRSO. Stan's blog has continued to be updated regularly, though lately the updates are often reprints rather than original content, and I've found the discussion harder to follow lately, though his posts consistently generate discussion, even the reprints. Pottawatomie Creek started off with frequent new content - including an interesting mix of local interest and personal posts along with some fairly high level polemics, such as a critique of the Marxist-Leninist FRSO that generated debate that spilled onto at least three other blogs as well (LeftSpot, Comrade Zero, and Celtic Fire). But Pottawatomie Creek has been relatively neglected lately, with very few new posts.
On the ML FRSO side of things, there was the (now-defunct) Take a Left blog. Later in this milieu came Comrade Zero's Marxism-Leninism blog, and yours-truly's LeftSpot blog.
There was/is a milieu of ML and MLM blogs that cohered on Xanga, which is an insular platform, so these blogs just interact with each other but not with blogs in the 'outside world'. Some from that milieu include(d) the 4th Flame, Maoist Disciple, Johnny Attero, I Wor Kuen, Roque Dalton Lives, etc. If you want to find what's up there now check the Marxism-Leninism blogring, Marxist Revolutionaries blogring, or some other similar blogrings. Again, these are all Xanga-only blogrings. The xanga-imposed insularity is annoying; it's aginst the open spirit of blogging and the web itself.
Then there is the milieu of ex-RCP supporters or RCP supporters with some clear line differences that they state publicly and debate on their blogs (as opposed to the RCP-supporter blogs listed above that do not publicly state any line differences with the RCP). Pivotal in this milieu is the burningman's Red Flags blog. Red Flags is run by burningman, an Maoist who is close to the RCP but has his critiques of them too, while also actively engaging other tendencies in the socialist left in a way that other RCP-supporter blogs don't. Red Flags took the scattered, disparate blogs of RCP, FRSO-ML, FRSO-LR, and ex-RCP milieus and brought everyone together to hash it all out in one place. While other blogs would post something and be lucky to get two or three comments (or in the case of Stan Goff, maybe 10 or 20), suddenly Red Flags blog was having threads of 100, 200 or more comments.
Red Flags was the breakthrough blog for the ML/MLM left. For a stretch, Red Flags was posting new content almost daily. And it was content with some thought behind it, designed specifically to draw out key line questions for communists in the US. Just sharp enough to make everyone want to argue, and just open enough to keep everyone feeling welcome and coming back for more. It is a testament to Red Flags that even now that burningman has posted almost no new content for a couple months, the debate still continues there with at least a few new comments on the old threads every day. While burningman has announced plans to launch a new, improved Red Flags site with threaded discussions, it hasn't happened yet. But the desire for such a space is clearly there, noted in the fact that people keep commenting on his blog even as he has left it in a state of relative neglect. The one frustration that I think many people have felt with Red Flags is that almost every thread at some point evolved (devolved?) into a heated debate about the RCP's 'culture of appreciation' around Bob Avakian. Figuring out how to avoid having every discussion turn into that will be a challenge for a relaunched Red Flags, whenever that might occur.
There are two other blogs I'd throw in the political category with Red Flags. These two are blogs that are done by people who used to put out the RCP line down-the-line on their old blogs, but have developed differences with the RCP that they are very public about on their new blogs. The first is the recently-shuttered Celtic Fire blog, and the second is the Bronx Bolshevik blog done by ShinethePath. Celtic Fire was posting new content nearly every day, and attracting a healthy, regular group of commenters (usually 10-20 comments on most posts). Many comments were by other communists but there were always a few people coming in asking questions who weren't familiar with it and Celticfire would write very long and detailed posts on their questions, whether they were key line questions or more obscure historical questions. Celtic Fire has also been a frequent commenter on many of the other blogs listed here. He consistently raised the level of discussion and debated out differences on high-level questions (summing up Stalin, democracy under the dictatorship of the proletariat, etc) in a principled way. In his last couple months of his blog, Celtic Fire developed a new innovation (at least for this milieu) of posting original interviews on his blog. The interviews were very interesting and thought-provoking, and then sparked debate in which the person interviewed would sometimes participate as well. Some examples are his interviews with Grover Furr, an academic expert on Stalin (part 1) (part 2); revolutionary writer and activist Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz; and Rob Los Ricos, an anarchist former political prisoner. Hopefully other ML bloggers will learn from Celtic Fire and develop new kinds of original content. Anyone wanna take a stab at a regular ML podcast?
The Bronx Bolshevik ins't updated much but ShinethePath is a frequent commenter on some of the other blogs listed here. And when it is updated the content is at times very deep and substantive. ShinethePath seems to have alot of knowlege about the history of the USSR for example.
So in a sense it feels like the end of a phase of ML blogging, with the slowing-down of Red Flags, the end of Celtic Fire, and the slowing to a trickle of a few others (Pottawatomie Creek for example). But at the same time, some more new promising ML blogs have recently been born, and their authors are on a tear, posting lots of new, original content. My two new favorites are Black Man With a Library, run by Kazembe Balagun, and All Out for the Fight, run by the Modern Pitung. I must give All Out for the Fight props for inspiring the writing of this post. His inaugural post All Out for the Fight - To Incite Through Insight on the development of the 'web 2.0' and what it means for us was indeed insightful and got me thinking about the historical development of the ML/MLM corner of the blogosphere. So thanks to the Modern Pitung for getting me writing on this topic!
What I have given here is a vaguely chronological development of the US-based ML/MLM blogosphere, as I have experienced it since 2003. I am doing this from memory and I'm sure there are some important blogs I've left out. I also have not put the development of these blogs in their proper political and historical context. An important point I'd like to make in that regard is the role of the revolutionary situation in Nepal in the coalescing of our corner of the blogosphere. At first there were a few of us, Red Flags and Take a Left that I remember most specifically, that were posting regularly about developments in Nepal, the advancement of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), and what that might mean for the left here as they move forward and if they were able to actually win power in Nepal. Stan Goff then had some discussion on Nepal, in which a burningman and a few others mixed it up. And I think the rise of Red Flags and Celtic Fire blogs specifically can be tied to the advance of the CPN(M) up to the point of the popular uprising that made the king blink and created the situation of dual power that exists now, as Nepal prepares for a constituent assembly that might abolish the monarchy and create a democratic republic. The CPN(M), by coming the closest to winning a socialist revolution that anyone has come since...Nicaragua in 1979 (?), has created a rare point of unity for basically all the self-identified non-Trot and anti-revisionist forces in the US. The CPN(M) is part of the RIM, the same international grouping as the RCP. So the RCP-aligned folks have followed those events and discussions closely (though interestingly there has been very little about Nepal on the closely-aligned RCP blogs - they seem to be taking an approach of studying the matter quietly as things unfold rather than publicly engaging the day-to-day developments). But supporters of both FRSO's as well as other non-aligned ML/MLM folks in the US see in the practice and theory of the CPN(M) some echose of some of the same criticisms that they have had of the RCP and some other RIM parties. So the rise of the CPN(M) to international prominence has played a key role in cohering our corner of the blogosphere, in my opinion. Interestingly the CPN(M)'s politics have also in some ways shaped the debate on other historical questions, that have been most sharply taken up and propogated by burningman and Celtic Fire, and debated by others (such as the question of how to sum up Stalin, the quesiton of multiple parties under socialism, questions around how to carry out the united front and the mass line, etc). Comrade Zero has also engaged the question of Stalin sharply on his blog, challenging many of the assumptions of the critics of Stalin. Klement's Rebelion in Justified blog has also taken inspiration from the revolution Nepal and has published materials from the CPN(M) that are not otherwise available online, including some important articles from issue 10 of the CPN(M)'s international journal, the Worker.
So, here we are, at the end of August 2006, with an evolving ML/MLM blog milieu. I hope to see more blogs with more original, quality content and discussion. I hope to see important questions discussed frankly among folks with various lines and from various organizations. I hope to see further unity among Marxist-Leninists in the US. What role can blogs play in building the Marxist-Leninist left in the US, and helping in the ongoing task of communists to rebuild a Communist Party in the US? I don't know. But I think it's clear that blogs (and other web communication technologies) are playing an increasingly important role. Let's see where things go from here.

Delicious
Digg
Google
Yahoo
Technorati


Great blog, great article.
Great blog, great article.
Hah, this is a throughouly
Hah, this is a throughouly interesting introduction for someone (me) who is just getting into this stuff. The level of debate on these ML blogs is far superior to other centers of Marxist discussion on the internet that I've encountered (For example, revolutionaryleft.com). Not to sound like I have a superiority complex or anything--but I'm excited to engage in some political discussion with people on my level.
peace & respect
--red scare--
It's No Accident
Hey! You forgot my blog, It's No Accident. It's been extant since April 2004, although I had some technical issues that I failed to resolve for a while, which eventually required me to re-found the thing in December 2005.
Not that I blame you for missing it, though, since I've been bad at updating it regularly.
-------
John Lacny
http://www.johnlacny.com
Tell no lies, claim no easy victories
It's an Accident
Sorry I indeed unintentionally skipped over your It's No Accident blog. I do remember it from the earlier period of blogging and used to check it fairly regularly. Then as you made reference to, it was dormant for a while so it sorta fell off my radar. Also if I remember correctly you used to participate on the Leftist Trainspotters list and then left that list so that may be the point at which I started to forget to check your blog too. I like your Amilcar Cabral byline. Would you consider yourself influenced by Cabral or just like the quote?
Tell no lies . . .
Cabral was a great revolutionary leader for his country, but his country was very small and not at all like the USA, so I can't quite say I am "influenced" by Cabral, because it's hard to see how you could have a "Cabralist" strategy inside the US. But the model of honesty before the masses embodied in the motto "Tell no lies, claim no easy victories" is universally applicable.
-------
John Lacny
http://www.johnlacny.com
Tell no lies, claim no easy victories
Links
By the way, I will link you from my blog and hope you will do the same.
-------
John Lacny
http://www.johnlacny.com
Tell no lies, claim no easy victories
The Memories
I use to run the Maoist_Disciple blog on myspace when I was more coherent to the RCP and Avakian tendency. I haven't posted anything in a while on my blog, but that will be changed shortly, my friend has helped me figure out the format and how to make my blog more dyanmic you can say. I will have a new post by the end of this week.
Maoist_Disciple on Xanga not
Maoist_Disciple on Xanga not myspace...sorry confusing online communities
Black Man With a Library blog no more...
Soon after this article was written, one of the most promising new red blogs, Black Man With a Library, run by Kazembe Balagun, ceased publishing, and actually been deleted from blogspot. So if you try the link, you'll get something else but not the blog that used to be there. But rumor has it that Kazembe has something else in the works, so I'll link to that when it materializes.
After Some Stewing, a Response
LS:
My apologies for the late reply to this posting. Before I say anything else, thanks for the kind words and the links -- they've brought good traffic to All Out, and built up its buzz to the point where I can now say that I had my first 100+ session day (my stats do not measure hits, as they're actually a misleading statistic).
To elucidate some of my ideas on the U.S. net-revs, red blogs, ML/M-blogosphere -- my terminology is inexact, as a Marxist revolutionary presence in blogs is still in its infancy -- I'll pose a few important questions that I believe are not yet fully answered:
1) How do revolutionary groups -- by necessity and strategy conspiratorial and secretive -- use the web to bridge the gap between themselves and the masses?
2) How does the stategy of revolutionary groups, which once centered upon a thoroughly "Old Media" format (the newspaper) need updating in light of the fact that the web and information technology, as well as its audience, is evolving and expanding?
3) In adapting to the new information technologies, what are some trends that show promise for spreading revolutionary ideas? How can they be implemented?
After consideration of these questions, the thing about Web 2.0 that I really believe should be of interest to us the most is the fact that it's a technology that Mao would quite possibly probably kill for: here is a technology and a media format that is in its essence based around the Mass Line: "from the masses, to the masses."
From the masses come disorganzed, scattered ideas: for instance, take the del.icio.us social bookmark service, which is built around the idea of clustering of ideas of the masses in a loose way (e.g., tagging them, sharing them, and retagging them).
To the masses go concentrated, correct ideas: for another, the blogger takes this information, and concentrates what is being talked about and concentrates the best and most correct ideas into a posting.
"And so on, over and over again in an endless spiral, with the ideas becoming more correct, more vital and richer each time."
What I've seen thus far is that blogs by revolutionaries tend to do well on one or the other aspect of the Mass Line: that is, we bloggers either take stuff reported and talked about by the masses and repost it; or we take ideas to the masses, in the form of original writings on theory or aspects of the struggle that we report on.
I think as a whole we need to improve our overall social functioning online -- that is, to integrate blogs into online communities where people tend to congregate, where the discourse is developing, and work harder to persevere.
I can provide one such example of how we can improve this: better integration with the Technorati service. It is insanely easy to get a Technorati account, as well as to tag content so that our content reaches a critical mass of users. In doing so, you reach a vast number of Technorati users -- who are also plugged into networks (both formal and informal) where they share their finds on the blogosphere.
For a success story: I happened to have a very well-trafficed day with my recent posting on Hugo Chavez at Cooper Union. That was likely due to the fact that I added the Technorati tag for "Hugo Chavez", and moreover that this tag was one of the most searched terms on the service on that day (due to all the talk about him in the mainstream media).
But that's not the whole of it: because I've made it easy to add my blog posts to social bookmarking sites, it ended up getting bookmarked through the Digg bookmarking/discussion service by three people. It meant that the post was exposed to their associates on the Digg service -- which includes thousands of people, at least a few of whom are going to be intrigued by a posting on Chavez.
Now that's a success story that I don't use just to brag about, but which I think is instructive in that most red bloggers simply don't use it -- which is a huge concession to the enemy. So, for example, go ahead and do a Technorati search for the tag "socialism." Dollars to donuts, the great majority of blog postings you'll find are written by anti-communists and capitalists.
By our self-exclusion, it means that the discourse in a highly trafficked area of the web on socialism is skewed rightward. That's bad enough. But moreover, our tech illiteracy means red blogging becomes just another echo chamber where red bloggers talk to one another, which enforces our isolation and creates a false sense of elitism.
on the points raised by Modern Pitung
Thanks Modern Pitung for your thoughtful reply. You raise many issues worth thinking about. Your comparison of the "Web 2.0" and the mass line may be a bit of a stretch, but you're right that a lot of potential is there to both synthesize scattered and disparate information from many sources among the masses as well as to collectively discuss questions with a broader group of people who otherwise would not have been able to come together to discuss such topics, and finally to put out concentrated line to potentially very broad sectors of people. Of course in the realm of blogging we are mostly talking about individual bloggers doing all this, whereas the mass line can really only be implemented in a real way on an organizational level.
Your second question is an interesting one: 'How does the stategy of revolutionary groups, which once centered upon a thoroughly 'Old Media' format (the newspaper) need updating in light of the fact that the web and information technology, as well as its audience, is evolving and expanding?'
Call me old school, but I still believe that a newspaper is a key tool for a revolutionary organization. While some of the positive qualities of having a newspaper can be replicated by various forms of online publishing and communication, there are still things a newspaper makes an organization do that help to develop the organization's politics (for example having a newspaper forces an organization to discuss line and develop a coherent line on key questions of the day to be able to put it out in print and go to the masses with it!). A newspaper really does help an organization cohere, both politically and practically, in a more coherent way than I think web publishing has been able to do.
It would be interesting to go back and read Lenin's What is to be Done? specifically thinking about it in terms of new web technologies and how they address or don't address the reasons Lenin put forward for the importance of a party having a newspaper.
I also find it mildly amusing (but see it as a good thing) that you seem to have made it your mission to drag ML bloggers into the sometimes foggy and perplexing world of the bleeding edge developments of Web 2.0. Largely as a result of your post here I finally got around to setting up a Technorati account, and I installed a module that will include links at the end of each post for people to click to add the article to their del.icio.us links, technorati, Digg, etc. I find your enthusiasm for the power of these sites/tools good, and your example of driving more traffic to your site via a Technorati tag for your Chavez article is a useful example of the potential that exists. It is still a very small handful of the web population that uses these tools, though it is growing quickly and exponentially, especially with services like flickr and delicious), and even a small portion of web users is still a heckuva lot of people.
On a slight digression, in this article on the ML corner of the blogosphere, I meant to get more into the question of what blogging platform / software people are using, and if/how that is changing/consolidating over time. At this point blogger/google is the most popular; it's free and easy to get something basic set up. Also there are tons of socialisty blogs that are integrated into people's myspace pages, which is an area in which I have only dabbled, but have not dove in full force. Some bloggers who are a bit more ambitious use Wordress or Typepad, and Movable Type seemed to be on the rise for a while but I get the sense that it's not as popular anymore. And there are many other blogging software platforms that are more marginal.
Largely because I seem to be unable to resist the attraction of spending (wasting?) large amounts of time learning web technologies that are very useful but admittedly very geeky (something we seem to have in common!), I decided to set up my blog myself on my own site, using Drupal open source software. Drupal is very powerful and can be used for alot more than blogging, but it can also be used to run a basic blogging site (with a few extras) like this one. I hope to eventually tap more into some of the other things Drupal has to offer over time on my blog site; like for example the forum that I have started here but not put alot of effort into yet, but I think could have alot of potential.
Those are some of my initial thoughts. I gotta run for now and read some more about the transition from feudalism to capitalism (I may have another post on that coming soon!)
excellent points
Modern Pitung and Left Spot -- thanks for thinking out loud on all this.
One of the biggest problems in the communist movement is the strange force of habit. "This is what we do." Task orientation... Not thinking about how effective "work" is and just sort of plugging away. Call it the "Really Existing Socialism Work Ethic."
The interrogation of web work here is really valuable. I'm definitely taking Pitung's notes about Technoratti and so on to heart for RedFlags 2.0.
What would be really helpful to folks who aren't as versed in media work, or with a long history of messaging work in general, would be a point-by-point breakdown of google-bombing, tagging, aesthetics-for-dummies, and so on. These two short breakdowns of communist webwork are really thnk pieces. I bet a more right-to-the-point list of advice would be helpful as hell.
Just a thought to those who are thinking.
Blogging about blogging, yada yada yada
B-man:
A lot of that stuff (point-by-point breakdown) is out there. Mostly, I recommend sitting down with a good book on your blogging client of choice ("Blogger in a Snap" is a good one for those with running off of Blogspot/Blogger; I don't know about Wordpress or Typepad guides). Blogs about blogging are out there. It's all within reach of a Google search and perhaps some sifting and refining of searchterms.
IMHO, there's a matter of consolidating that information underneath one roof, which is the task of -- how to put it? -- a more collective mind. There are general rules to follow with blogs, but there are particular issues around the clients, software, and approaches that need to be considered, that are larger than any one single author.
Interesting
I found this article very informative and interesting.
Now we all must get more thoroughtly organised.
Regards
Abhay